Tag: eighth amendment
-
Lifetime sex offender registration not ‘punishment,’ Colorado justices say
The Colorado Supreme Court concluded on Monday that lifetime sex offender registration is not cruel and unusual punishment because it is not “punishment.” At the same time, two members urged lawmakers to heed the advice of the Sex Offender Management Board and adopt a new, more accurate system of measuring a person’s risk of recidivism.…
-
Appeals judge urges restraint in labeling new offenses serious across board
A member of the state’s second-highest court urged his colleagues on Thursday to pump the brakes before declaring new offenses “grave or serious” in every possible scenario. The Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment means sentences cannot be grossly disproportionate to the crime. Consequently, when judges in Colorado examine the constitutionality of a…
-
Federal judge declines to dismiss claims against prison officials for seizure-related death
A federal judge declined last month to dismiss the claims against numerous prison employees for a man’s in-custody death following several seizures and his repeated ingestion of liquified pain-numbing medication. The mother and minor children of Victor Esquivel sued the state’s corrections director, prison supervisors, corrections officers, medical employees and a medical staffing firm after…
-
Colorado justices splinter over approach to sentencing review
Members of the Colorado Supreme Court were divided on Monday about whether vehicular homicide stemming from intoxicated driving is “grave and serious” in every possible scenario, with two justices suggesting the court reconfigure its approach for determining the proportionality of criminal sentences. The Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment means sentences cannot be…
-
10th Circuit underscores most lawsuits against federal officials are ‘dead’
The federal appeals court based in Denver emphasized on Tuesday that lawsuits against federal officials who violate people’s constitutional rights are “all but dead” — thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decisions. Lawsuits seeking money damages against federal employees for constitutional violations are known as a “Bivens remedy,” stemming from a 1971 Supreme Court…
-
Colorado Supreme Court to examine whether portion of anti-SLAPP law is unconstitutional
The Colorado Supreme Court announced on Monday that it will address whether lawmakers inadvertently violated the state constitution by creating a unique pathway for appeals under a law designed to shield First Amendment conduct from lawsuits. At least three of the court’s seven members must agree to hear a case on appeal. The justices also accepted…
-
Federal judge says jury not influenced by incarcerated plaintiff’s appearance in shackles
A federal judge last month rejected an incarcerated plaintiff’s request for a new civil trial in his constitutional rights lawsuit, concluding the jury was not influenced by the man’s appearance in shackles at trial. This summer, Dean Carbajal received a jury trial on his claim that Colorado Department of Corrections employees failed to protect him…
-
10th Circuit underscores high standard for constitutional claims against doctors
The federal appeals court based in Denver agreed last week that a doctor did not violate the constitutional rights of an incarcerated man who later died, while rebuffing a perceived attempt to “redefine the standard” for holding medical providers liable. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit underscored that…
-
Colorado justices skeptical of opening door to resentencing defendants under ‘3 strikes’ law
Members of the Colorado Supreme Court gave an icy reception on Tuesday to the idea that defendants convicted decades ago and serving lengthy sentences under the state’s “three strikes” law should have the opportunity to argue their punishments are grossly disproportionate under current standards. Although Colorado’s Habitual Criminal Act has undergone changes since its enactment…
-
Colorado justices decline to find life sentences unconstitutional for non-triggermen
A life sentence without parole does not violate the constitutional prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment for defendants who did not kill the victim personally, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Monday. Prior to 2021, life without parole was the punishment for those convicted of felony murder. A defendant is guilty of felony murder if…