Governor candidates debate business climate, housing affordability
Four of the five major-party candidates for Colorado governor share common ground on two big issues: They see the perception that Colorado has become less business‑friendly as a serious concern, and they view housing affordability as central to the state’s economic future.
At a May 28 forum in Glendale, Democratic candidates U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet and Attorney General Phil Weiser joined two of the three Republicans, state Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer and ministerial leader Victor Marx, to discuss housing, data centers, land‑use policy, business regulation, and how to balance the state’s energy demands with sustainability goals.
The forum, hosted by First Bank/PNC and Land Title Guarantee, drew an audience of several hundred business leaders. Moderated by Colorado Politics Editor Luige del Puerto, candidates received questions in advance of the event.
Weiser, in his remarks on business regulation and competitiveness, cited the example of a Colorado company that expanded into Oklahoma. Weiser said the CEO of Durango-based Agile Space Industries found “the wind at his back,” not in his face, when he wanted to expand. Much of that is due to the time it takes to get permits, and in Oklahoma, it was days, not months or even a year, as it is in Colorado, he said.
Weiser said he has a “can-do, problem-solving” leadership style that he will bring to the governor’s office.
Kirkmeyer pointed to her 20 years as a county commissioner and the past six in the Senate, where she is the ranking Republican on the Joint Budget Committee that recently finished crafting the $48.8 billion state budget.
It’s important to get the state back on track, Kirkmeyer said, adding that eight years of one-party control have made an unaffordable mess of the state.
“I know where the problems are with state government,” she told the audience. “I know how to govern.”
Marx noted that he is the only non-politician among the candidates and claimed that the challenges faced by business are created by politicians.
Colorado needs the business community to provide jobs for economic sustainability, and with businesses leaving, “we’ve got to turn some things around,” he said.
Bennet said he is the only candidate with significant private-sector experience, beginning with his work for Phil Anschutz, the current owner of Colorado Politics and The Gazette, on distressed-debt purchases.
From there, he worked for then-Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper and later as the head of Denver Public Schools, before Hickenlooper as governor appointed him to the U.S. Senate.
“I’m deeply worried about the direction Colorado is headed,” Bennet told the audience. He said Colorado is losing businesses for the first time since the 1980s, including roughly 25% of its restaurants, and argued that Denver is now the emptiest large city in the country and the third‑least affordable.
“But I think that we can turn it around,” the Democratic senator said, pointing to state assets like space, national defense, energy and technology. “… And we have the imagination of the people of Colorado.”
What specific policy changes on land use, energy, permitting or taxation would the candidates prioritize in order to restore the state’s competitive edge?
“When you have a regulatory policy conversation, and the people who would be affected by the regulation are not at the table, you’re not positioned to make good public policy,” Weiser said, saying a cultural change is required.
Weiser argued that when regulations move from a single anecdote to a drafted bill and then become law — without the affected people ever feeling heard — it signals two needed cultural shifts: identifying the real problem a policy is meant to solve, and evaluating whether the proposed solution actually works.
Kirkmeyer argued that the state’s challenges can’t be addressed by focusing on just one issue, whether it’s permitting delays, excessive permitting, overregulation, or high taxation.
She said she would task her executive directors on day one to claw back regulations that are overly burdensome and excessive. And she added she would focus on fixes to the education system, where she said third graders are unable to read at a third-grade level.
Marx cited housing affordability as his first priority, noting that it creates an environment that is not business-friendly.
“We’ve got to get people with competence back in positions of leadership and management of what’s been entrusted to us,” he said, adding that developing affordable housing is key.
He also pledged to protect TABOR.
Bennet said Colorado is no longer as competitive as it was 15 years ago. “We’ve allowed other places to compete more effectively,” he said, blaming the legislature, which he stressed hasn’t thought much about the “unintended consequences of mostly well-meaning legislation.”
Bennet’s plan is to build a coalition between families and businesses to address issues such as housing, child care costs and the lack of quality education.
The candidates were also asked about the balance between sustainability, climate goals, and energy affordability.
Weiser pointed to solar, noting it’s the most abundant energy source right now. He would look to enable more solar and other clean energy sources, but that would also require more transmission infrastructure.
Kirkmeyer indicated she isn’t on board with some of the state’s sustainability goals, but said that, given all the legislation passed in this area, the first step is to stop moving the goalposts.
Marx said he would create a commission to develop solutions. He emphasized that the government should not mandate an all‑electric transition or assume that expanding government is inherently better.
Bennet argued that President Donald Trump has twice succeeded politically, in part, because of the energy and climate debates. He said that even though most Americans accept that climate change is real, these issues continue to shape voter behavior.
“We’ve lost to a person whose energy policy is literally Sarah Palin’s cartoon version of ‘drill, baby, drill,’” Bennet said. “That’s the energy policy of the United States of America,” and not a good one for oil and gas, renewables, or innovation, he said.



